CCWN 76:67 MORE THOUGHTS ON RECEIVER DESIGN F0R CCW BY RAY PETTT I feel that CCW is a technique that should be used as the finishing touch to an already-existing high-performance receiving and transmitting system. By this I mean that we should utilize the best-available non-coherent receiver design concepts to start with, and then adapt these to CCW by using appropriately designed frequency synthesizers. It makes little sense to me to attempt CCW with its 5-Hz bandwidth and such but with a receiver that will flatten out under conditions of moderate interference 10 kHz away--a receiver weakness which could be eliminated with good design without CCW' In the October 1975 issue of Ham Radio, page 26, Rhode described a receiver front-end which appears to me to be the best design yet published in amateur literature. It uses a few carefully-chosen components in a surprisingly simple circuit and yields dynamic range greatly exceeding anything being sold in the amateur market. Wes Hayward, W7ZOI, published an article, "Competition Grade CW Receiver" in QST, March and April, 1974. I went to Wes' home in Beaverton, Oregon, some time back, and he showed me his prototype. I have never heard a better-sounding receiver. Internal noise in the i.f. and audio was nil, and the agc had instantaneous, perfect response--no pumping, popping, overshoot or hang-up on noise. His approach--placing the entire i.f. and agc system between two 9-MHz KVG cw filters--is the secret behind the panel. In the meantime, I did some work with front-end filters. I discovered that certain toroids made by Indiana General have superb characteristics for use as the inductors in beautiful ham-band filters. I made a set of such filters using the tables in Zerev's "Handbook of Filter Synthesis". Once aligned, each filter covers an entire ham band without need of adjustment (no preselector control required'). Each filter has 50 ohm input and output impedance, required no taps on the inductors, and has less than 1 dB of insertion loss. Image rejection using a 9-MHz i.f. and a 5 MHz local oscillator for 20 meters is in the order of 100 dB. At this point we make our receiver (or transceiver) CCW compatible by designing a synthesized local oscillator and bfo. Design work I've been doing indicates that the way to go involves a super-clean VFO synthesizer covering 1.100,000 to 1.599,990 MHz in 10 Hz steps and individual VFO signal up-converters using phase locked crystal oscillators and mixers-- one for each ham band covered I think it would be worthwhile for readers of CCWN to work together on building equipment of this type.